I dunno if it is a right place to post it but do you guys have the intention to implement CUDA since it was support in both Linux and Windows ?
Except Schrodinger I didn't see any project that make use of CUDA in linux.Sorry if I have caused disturbance for any ATI user.
Hm. IMO CUDA would be great for the core, but the downsides are it only works with NVIDIA cards and only on Widnows/Linux (no Mac, if IIRC). I don't think it's worth the effort, even though it wouldn't be bad to have it optionally.
Er..I change my question.What about openCL ? Look like it will overcome the lacks you mention above.Can we have a future with it ?
I don't think Cuda would be worth it at all, since you can only do one task at a time, so you'd be completely screwed using Cuda unless you owned 2 nvidia video cards.
Not to mention the task of rewriting the whole GB/GBA emu cores...
this leads me to believe that nvidia isn't using CUDA physics, but instead consumer level physics (game based)... since it seems you can do it with a single card.
Â
so the driver is obviously defining shader groups as Geometry, physics, and graphical shaders
Havok uses Shader Model 3.0 pixel shaders for physics.
I'm in ur graphix card, shadin' ur physics.
"I'm in ur graphix card, shadin' ur physics. "
Â
Read up on GPGPU. Then come back and talk about physics via shaders.
lol, Physics is rendered via shader clusters working in parallel.