VisualBoyAdvance-M

Well Chrono Archangel, it certainly feels that way.

 

I remember arguing with you, and now I don't feel anything. Yet I still feel ill will around these parts..

no i really don't have any bad intentions mudlord, trully...

 

but i've searched the whole svn repo, but couldn't find protect.exe

a little help maybe? [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/smile.png[/img]/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

 

@Mudlord: what i've seen so far, is really, REALLY promising [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/smile.png[/img]/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

protect.exe is private property.

kameleon: see PM, it should give you an idea [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/tongue.png[/img]/emoticons/tongue@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

ill refrain from posting it in the actual thread since this protection seems to be soooo important.

no i really don't have any bad intentions mudlord, trully...

 

but i've searched the whole svn repo, but couldn't find protect.exe

a little help maybe? [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/smile.png[/img]/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" />

 

There is no need. The latest revisions always have builds available (especially the mfc ones).

 

Why your insistence, since you can just use the latest builds directly, and immediately share feedback about these? (if sharing feedback and testing the latest revs really was the intent, needless to state).

More specifically, why the repeat avoiding to provide direct answer to that question ?

kameleon: see PM, it should give you an idea

Any programmer should have a idea how to remove it. Sheesh.

 

ill refrain from posting it in the actual thread since this protection seems to be soooo important.

 

You just don't quit, don't you?

Why don't you now post it in the thread, since the instigators are long gone. Besides, there is MUCH better protections out there. If we wanted to, the executable could be wrapped with ASProtect with encrypted PE sections. Least that will give even pros a challenge.

Any programmer should have a idea how to remove it. Sheesh.

 

Apparently not, and your attitude towards potential new devs is really sad. Everyone has to start somewhere.

 

Besides, there is MUCH better protections out there. If we wanted to, the executable could be wrapped with ASProtect with encrypted PE sections. Least that will give even pros a challenge.

 

Duh.

our attitude towards potential new devs is really sad.

 

They should NOT be starting with such complex things. They either should learn to code properly, or GTFO.

 

Everyone has to start somewhere.

 

Anywhere but here >.>

 

Duh.

 

No need for the attitude, or is that reserved just for your most hated minions?

No need for the attitude, or is that reserved just for your most hated minions?

 

I don't hate you. You just can't get over the fact you got banned from Emuforums. My attitude is nothing compared to what you gave me a while back.

 

Back on topic please. I believe someone was looking for help.

In fact, if these kinds of threads are frowned upon, why not just close it now?

I don't hate you.

 

Liar.

 

You just can't get over the fact you got banned from Emuforums.

 

Again, another lie. I have got over that place long ago and I see it for what it really is.

 

My attitude is nothing compared to what you gave me a while back.

 

Does that justify it though?

 

In fact, if these kinds of threads are frowned upon, why not just close it now?

 

Because I can't close it. Don't you fucking get it that I am NOT a admin and I am NOT part of this?