This would really be great.
Â
Publishing on sf would be perfect because there are already scripts which scan
all project related files on sf and lists them. For vbam it would be here:
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/vbam/
Â
You also don't necessarily have to publish tar.gz tarballs (although this is the most common format of sources). We also accept zip files to make it a bit more Windows user friendly [img]<fileStore.core_Emoticons>/emoticons/wink.png[/img]/emoticons/wink@2x.png 2x" width="20" height="20" /> But the format really shouldn't matter.
It is just important that you choose a filename format and stick to it so we can scan for the version number in those files. E.g. choose a filename like: vbam-version-source.zip. Or anything like that. Just make the version number easy distinctable from the prefix (project name, package name) and the suffix ("-source" and file extension).
In this case we would just parse the filenames with this regex:
vbam-([\d\.]+)-source\.zip
Â
Hm, as you said you will publish SVN snapshots instead of real version numbers. (I just see that revision 877 is called version 1.8.0 so maybe you have both). In this case you probably have the revision the source "tarball" is based on in its file name.
So maybe the file name will be like this: vbam-svn970-source.zip
In this case we would just parse for: vbam-svn([\d]+)-source\.zip
Â
These are just some hints for how to name the source archive so we can easily scan for new versions.
Â
It would be great if you could implement this procedure in your team that just each team member (when publishing a new executable) now just also has to put the code of this revision the executable is based on in such a "tarball" or zip file or whatever, name the file properly and upload it on sourceforge.
Â
If you think vbam has reached a stable revision we can also think about getting the project into the official Ubuntu and Debian repositories.
This way it will be of more use to more people than just the users who use our PlayDeb repository (which is a non official project).
Â
//edit
If you publish the files on your blog it is also fine if the filename is directly readable from the link (and not the link text).
E.g. vbam-svn870-source.zip <-- this won't work because the link itself ("test") is parsed and not the text displayed in the browser.